Home>> Let's Talk Hydraulics>> Gerotor Type Motors and Extremely Low Speeds>>
InsaneHydraulics - Sergiy Sydorenko 2009-2010 All Ridghts Reserved
    The following episode happened just a couple of weeks ago, and is worth describing because it addresses several interesting questions concerning the so-widely-spread low speed high torque gerotor/geroller type hydraulic motors, as well as small, and sometimes not so obvious differences between original motors and cheap copies.

    Presently, low priced and mostly Chinese made hydraulics has literally flooded the European market. If you take a look at any business directory, you will find hundreds of Chinese suppliers selling copies of all existing  "real" hydraulic equipment brands, from spare parts to complete pump/motor units. And, of course, the most common and cheapest type of hydraulic motor, namely gerotor/geroller type is no exception.

    The main advantage of Chinese-made motors is their price, of course, which being a fraction of cost of an original motor attracts European resellers like sugar attracts ants. And although some (not all, oh no...) Chinese manufacturers do produce motors of acceptable quality, I would still strongly advise a sheer amount of exhaustive sample testing before ordering any Chinese made hydraulics. Even after that you should be morally prepared for unexpected surprises.

    It is newer wise to row against the current, and rejecting Chinese hydraulics means giving market to competition, so many, if not all, European hydraulic companies stock low-priced OMR/OMP copies along with original ones, to satisfy the "poorer-folks" demand. Most of the times such copies perform just like the original motors at half of the price, but not ALL of the times...

    This time a client was claiming warranty replacement of two OMR125 geroller type motors, copies, not original, which according to him weren't turning. It was an unexpected claim, as, first of all, these motors had been bench tested prior to shipment, and the same client had bought similar motors before, which performed flawlessly on identical equipment.

    The motors were tested again, showing normal efficiency and no problems whatsoever. Despite that, the motors were disassembled "just in case", and no wear or visible damage was detected. Then they were reassembled, retested, and prepared to be shipped to the client with the advice to look for a problem elsewhere in the circuit. When the motors were just about to be handed over to the transport agent, the region sales-man brought up in a conversation a fact - these two motors were operating in parallel, driven by a simple small power-pack. One word caught my attention - small. When I wondered HOW SMALL it was, it turned out the output flow of the pump was around 1.5 liters per minute, which meant one thing - cancel the delivery, let's retest the motors under the newly discovered low flow conditions! Before that new information (go figure!), the motors had been tested with nominal oil flows.

     Although such motors are high torque low speed, it is normal for them to present certain speed rip or unstable jerky movement at extremely low speeds. That is why in some catalogues you will find minimum speed reference, and also such thing as minimum starting torque, which is LOWER than maximum torque at nominal speed with the SAME lines delta P. The rotor position, and the commutator valve (which in these motors is the machined shaft)  position contribute to this phenomenon.

    When the motors were tested with the given low flow, one of them appeared to be stalling at certain positions of the shaft with all the flow (1 lpm) passing through the motor creating only 30 bar delta P. Which meant that with the flow that low, creating the amount of shaft torque sufficient to raise the system pressure to 30 bars was enough to stall the motor. The system pressure wouldn't rise more because of the A to B leak inside the commutator valve. The phenomenon was not noticeable at higher flows. Then I tested an original Danfoss OMR-125 motor, and it clearly showed a much less noticeable speed rip (although present), and no stalling points. By the way, Sauer-Danfoss state the minimum speed of 9 rpms for these motors, which would equal roughly 1.2 lpm flow.

     Let's look into this low speed rip phenomenon. A common gerotor motor has a 7 tooth outer ring and a 6 tooth rotor, thus creating seven working chambers. Normally three are pressurized, three are connected to tank, and one is in "transitional" state, passing from T to P. In that particular motor, probably due to machining error, (or lack of quality control, or lack of quality equipment, or disrespect to tolerances, or lack of working conditions, or all of the above and a lot more...) the commutator valve was slightly underlapping, thus creating the small leak between the lines in the "transition" chamber groove. When the supplied flow rate became comparable to the leak rate, the leak itself became the effective pressure limiting factor. Of course this wasn't an issue at nominal flow rates.

    The problem was solved by testing several equal motors and choosing two with the least noticeable speed  fluctuation at the given low flow. It also must be said that the price of the two motors was lower than the price of one original.

    This example is perfect to show that  lower price comes at the cost of quality (both machining and material), and that a copy is never as good as the original.

     It also shows that choosing motors for very low speeds or stall conditions has its peculiarities. Low speeds bring along jerky movement, which sometimes can be unacceptable, and for some motors, like gerotor/geroller type motors, there is a minimum starting torque, which is lower than the maximum torque - something that should be taken into account when sizing such motors to create torque under stall/start conditions.    
Home
Introduction
The Simple Test
Back-Engineering?
The Most Basic Basics
Let's Talk Hydraulics
Back-Engineer This!
Battlefield
Kaboom
Library
News Archive
Bla-Blaimer
Contacts
Guestbook
HomeIntroductionThe Simple TestBack-Engineering?The Most Basic BasicsLet's Talk HydraulicsBack-Engineer This!BattlefieldKaboomLibraryNews ArchiveBla-BlaimerContactsGuestbook |