Home>> Let's Talk Hydraulics>> Load Sensing Line Flow - Another Way to Get in Trouble>>
InsaneHydraulics - Sergiy Sydorenko 2009-2011 All Ridghts Reserved
Home
Introduction
The Simple Test
Back-Engineering?
The Most Basic Basics
Let's Talk Hydraulics
Back-Engineer This!
Battlefield
Kaboom
Library
News Archive
Bla-Blaimer
Contacts
Guestbook
HomeIntroductionThe Simple TestBack-Engineering?The Most Basic BasicsLet's Talk HydraulicsBack-Engineer This!BattlefieldKaboomLibraryNews ArchiveBla-BlaimerContactsGuestbook |
     As I was re-reading my post on the Atlas-Copco case, I remembered another curious episode, that shows the importance of taking oil flow in the LS line into account.

     From what I've been seeing, a lot of "recently advanced" hydraulic techs are convinced that in static (please, note that in this article I am referring only to static, or as I like calling it, classic load sensing, not dynamic) closed center load sensing systems that use variable displacement pumps, the LS signal line transports nothing but pressure signal, or, in other words, the flow inside the LS line is minimal, and is only defined by the control spool leakage factor. This is not always true. Depending on the pump control design a flow in the LS line can exist, and it should be considered when projecting or troubleshooting such circuits. As I already described in the above mentioned troubleshooting episode, flow in the LS line causes a pressure drop that adds to the delta P introduced by the metering element (distributor valve, restrictor, calibrated orifice, etc...), which means that the size and the length of the line affects performance. Another very important thing to consider is the simple fact that oil flow always brings along particles, which, when big enough, can cause troubles - especially in load sensing lines that  incorporate small orifices. The following troubleshooting episode is a good example of such "particle related malfunction".

     ...A hydraulic bone-crushing press broke down, and a hydraulic technician was called in. When I say bone-crushing press I mean literally - used for crushing bones to squeeze out the attached meat leftovers and juices - a part of the production process of a big sausage plant. The symptom was the complete loss of pressing force. In fact, the piston could barely move, even with no bones in the press. Turning the machine off and on would make it work fine for a short period of time, but after a couple of minutes the press would slow down again. The circuit was powered by a Parker PV140 variable displacement pump,  equipped with load sensing, pressure compensator, and torque limiter control (schematics). The LS port was connected directly to the pump outlet via a short 8 mm metal pipe. The rest of the system consisted of a couple of custom built manifolds incorporating logic elements and electric pilots - a pretty standard solution for the purpose.

    Pressure readings confirmed that during the "slow stretches" the system was at stand-by pressure. Suspecting pump control malfunction the technician tried to adjust the torque limiter setting to see how the control would respond. The main reason why he went directly for the torque limiter was the fact that the previous alike failure had been caused by the torque limiter malfunction. Of course, he tried to adjust the torque limiter during the "fast stretch" - after the machine had been turned off and on. As soon as he barely touched the torque limiter adjustment screw, turning it out around an eighth of a turn - the system went slow. Apparently, the torque limiter was faulty, and indeed, when it was disassembled, a distinct wear marks and a deep groove were discovered on the limiter needle. Since the pump had already had enough hours on its shoulders to justify an overhaul, it was dismounted and brought over to the shop.

    After the consequent (and expensive) overhaul  the pump, naturally, ended up on the test bench. Since no replacement for the torque limier cartridge was available immediately, and the press had to be put back in service as fast as possible, a decision was made to rectify the needle of the torque limiter relief valve and "see what happens"... The rest of the pump controls were disassembled, inspected and thoroughly cleaned. The pump worked very decently for a couple of minutes, and then  - the malfunction reemerged when an attempt to lower the torque limiter setting was undertaken - the pump all of a sudden went into the stand-by mode. Since the problem would occur every time a torque limiter adjustment was fiddled - a logical assumption was made that the torque limiter relief valve was warn out beyond repair and needed replacement. By chance, during one of the tests the technician decided to adjust the pressure compensator before adjusting the torque limiter - and exactly the same thing happened  - as soon as the adjustment screw was turned out - the pump "went stand-by" and stayed there. In both cases, when the electric motor of the test bench was stopped and restarted - the symptom would apparently disappear for some time. Everybody was puzzled...

    Despite seemingly mysterious, the case has a very simple explanation, and  if you carefully look into the operation of the pump control, you will see that it is very easy to come up with a theory that can explain all of the symptoms. This pump's control operation is based on a single spool (schematics) - namely the LS spool, which along with the natural load sensing function (keeping the constant delta P between the LS port and the pump outlet) also assures the pressure compensator and torque limiting function by means of venting the signal line through the two relief valves - one with fixed setting (pressure compensator function), and one with displacement dependent setting (torque limiter).

    Let us ask ourselves - what is common for both situations - when the torque limiter and the pressure compensator are turned out? What is that common thing that happens inside the control when any of the two adjustments is lowered? - That's right - whenever any of the two relieves kicks in - the oil in the LS line starts to flow. It doesn't take much to imagine a condition when the LS signal gets blocked whenever a flow builds up - and the condition is - loose particle over an orifice, that functions like a sort of a load anti-drop valve, closing the orifice every time the oil flow is strong enough to lift it up.

   Take a look at this drawing - despite having been cleaned several times, the fitting mounted above the orifice had never been unscrewed, and since the person responsible for cleaning the parts could clearly see the light through the apparently unobstructed orifice, he assumed that it was not necessary to disassemble it. The hard particle, that got caught in the cavity above the orifice was plugging the orifice whenever a flow strong enough to lift it built in the line. The fitting was taken out - and a small piece of hardened rubber was discovered under it, and, of course, removing it solved the problem.

   Troubleshooting is all about coming up with theories and testing them. And I must tell you, that it was extremely rewarding for me to hear about the symptoms, and then to be able to tell what was happening and indicate exactly where to look for the problem, and to be right about it! I'm not bragging, I merely show that
a) complete understanding of a component's operation, and
b) sufficient test data
are the two main conditions for coming up with a valid theory that has the best chance to prove right.

    So, in static closed center load sensing systems, depending on the type of the variable displacement pump control, oil flow can build in the LS signal line - a fact not to be forgotten to assure efficient troubleshooting of such hydraulic circuits.
Parker PV140 schematics
Parker PV 140 schematics
Contamination picked up by the oil flow